Why Brightwork Does Not Publish Author Names On Articles
Last Updated on March 19, 2025 by Primary Researcher
Executive Summary
- Our articles do not have named authors.
- This article explains the reason why.
Introduction
There is an important reason why we do not have published names as the authors of our articles.
Question From Potential Subscriber
This is an email from a potential subscriber.
I’m considering subscribing to your site, but I can’t seem to find who the doctors or researchers are that are responsible for all of the information. I assume this is so the medical establishment doesn’t go after them and try to shut them down (or worse).
Are the people behind the research ever brought to light, perhaps once a person subscribes? I would imagine that keeping this information hidden is a deterrent to a great many curious potential subscribers, especially given the number of scammers out there trying to make money off of sick, desperate people.
Our Answer
We have a system where you can publish your identity if you want to agree with the establishment, but if you don’t, you need to be anonymous. The Midwestern Doctor, one of the best writers in this area, also does this. If public, he would be reported to a medical board. As an MD you can be corrupt, be incompetent and screw up the lives of patients and medical boards will turn a blind eye — but if you publicly contradict the medical establishment — that is when the medical boards spring into action. Their primary reason for existence appears to be punishing “rogue doctors” who don’t do exactly as they are told in putting pharmaceutical companies and their employers (hospitals, medical offices, etc) over the interests of their patients.
You may have seen a new de-banking bill that was passed.
Understanding De Banking
So the technique is both personal attacks and attacks on the entity’s financial support. Cut off the funding of the non-status quo entity for being not politically correct, contradicting MD Anderson, saying vaccines aren’t fantastic, disagreeing that everyone should be on their 10th booster, etc. Then, the status quo is protected.
Russell Brand’s Demonitization
Russell Brand was the target of a media smear campaign where ex-lovers of Brand were cultivated to try to come up with a sexual assault allegation. If Brand had not been such an effective critic of the vaccines and covid policies, these allegations would unlikely have ever been developed. However, paid by Big Pharma, the establishment media did as they were told. Two days after the allegations, Google demonetized Brand’s YouTube channel and never re-monetized it.
No criminal charges were ever brought, and the stories about Russell Brand were very clearly trumped up to make consensual relationships appear non-consensual. In this way, the establishment media fill the role of attack dogs for concentrated power- in this case, the concentrated power of Big Pharma.
Does Being Anonymous Hurt Us?
We have not gotten many questions about the fact that the researcher author is not listed, but this most likely does not help us gain subscribers, as people tend to want to know who is providing them with information and what their credentials are.
Conclusion
Contradicting the medical establishment is a dangerous game. The drug cartels are generally known to have infiltrated the Mexican political system, and different sections of the Mexican military are partnered with different cartels. Mexico cannot police the cartels because it is difficult to say where the Mexican cartels are distinct from the Mexican government. In the US, and in nearly all other similar counties (Australia, Europe, etc..) the same can be said for the relationship between the pharmaceutical companies and these governments.